2024 (8) TMI 1185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... stated the facts of the case are that the assessee is a licensed chillies commission agent in Agricultural Market Yard Committee [AMYC], Guntur. The assessee filed its return of income for the AY 2023-24 on 30/09/2023 declaring a total income of Rs. 13,97,030/- wherein the assessee claimed TDS credit for Rs. 2,49,110/-. Thereafter, the Ld. AO, CPC while processing the return of income u/s. 143(1) of the Act granted TDS only to the extent of Rs. 12,903/- and disallowed the TDS credit of Rs. 2,36,207/- [Rs. 2,49,110 - Rs. 12,903 = Rs. 2,36,207/-] and passed the Intimation u/s. 143(1) of the Act on 09/01/2024. Aggrieved by the Intimation of the Ld. AO, CPC passed u/s. 143(1) of the Act, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. Addl / JCIT ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ra) and reiterated that since the assessee is only a commission agent, the assessee is eligible to get credit of the entire amount deducted as tax at source u/s. 194Q of the Act and therefore pleaded that the grounds raised by the assessee may be allowed. The Ld. AR further submitted that on the identical facts and circumstances, the Hon'ble Tribunal has decided the case in favour of the assessee in the case of Yagneswari General Traders vs. ITO in ITA No. 39/Viz/2024 (AY 2022-23, dated 18/03/2024. Therefore, the Ld. AR strongly relied on the decision of this Bench (supra) and pleaded that considering the similar facts and circumstances, the decision taken by the Bench in the case of Yagneswari General Traders vs. ITO (supra) may be applied....