2024 (8) TMI 1096

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e respondents on 22.07.2008, but without any notice or without affording any opportunity of hearing, the respondents discontinued his services w.e.f. 06.02.2009. Counsel submits that the petitioner raised an industrial dispute by way of filing an application under Section 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short "the Act of 1947") before the Conciliation Officer. Counsel submits that the said application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the appropriate Government vide impugned order dated 05.07.2010 on the pretext that he was employed with the respondents for a period of 85 days only and he could not substantiate his claim for further employment with any documentary evidence. Counsel submits that the aforesaid order passed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ord. 5. Perusal of the record indicates that the petitioner submitted an application under Section 2A of the Act of 1947 before the Conciliation Officer stating therein that he was engaged on the post of Jalsewak by the respondents on 22.07.2008 and his services were discontinued without issuing any notice and without providing any opportunity of hearing by the respondents, vide order dated 06.02.2009. Several grounds were raised by the petitioner including non-compliance of the provisions contained under Section 25G of the Act of 1947, while terminating the services of the petitioner. Reply to the aforesaid application was submitted by the respondents and an objection was taken therein that the petitioner had hardly worked for only 85 day....