Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1978 (3) TMI 64

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... been referred: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in cancelling the penalty of Rs. 72,220 levied under s. 271(1)(c) of the Act ?" For the assessment year 1964-65, for which the previous year ended on July 1, 1963, the assessee returned an income of Rs. 2,01,000. The assessee's business was banking and money-lending. He later filed a revise....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d a penalty of an equal amount of Rs. 72,220. On appeal, the Tribunal found that what was brought to tax, namely, Rs. 2,15,000, together with the outstanding as on July 1, 1963, to the extent of Rs. 3,85,000 disclosed under the Finance Act of 1965, cannot be referred to the earnings of any particular year. There being no evidence to show that this sum of Rs. 72,220 added by the ITO could be relate....