Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

1978 (3) TMI 64

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... been referred: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in cancelling the penalty of Rs. 72,220 levied under s. 271(1)(c) of the Act ?" For the assessment year 1964-65, for which the previous year ended on July 1, 1963, the assessee returned an income of Rs. 2,01,000. The assessee's business was banking and money-lending. He later filed a revise....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d a penalty of an equal amount of Rs. 72,220. On appeal, the Tribunal found that what was brought to tax, namely, Rs. 2,15,000, together with the outstanding as on July 1, 1963, to the extent of Rs. 3,85,000 disclosed under the Finance Act of 1965, cannot be referred to the earnings of any particular year. There being no evidence to show that this sum of Rs. 72,220 added by the ITO could be relate....