Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1978 (6) TMI 37

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... this case with the liability of two of the items of property belonging to the deceased, Shampur Papanna, who died on October 3, 1963. The said two items are, (i) a house bearing No. 8, New High School Road, Visveswarapuram, Bangalore City, and (ii) a house bearing No. 9 situated in the same road. The deceased had made a gift of item No. (i) in favour of his two grand-sons and item No. (ii) in fav....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hich had been gifted to their son, Ramesh Chandra Murthy, i.e., item No. (ii) mentioned above. The other premises was not being used by the donor and his wife and they were not in possession of the same for more than two years prior to the death of the donor. When the question of the inclusion of these properties in the chargeable estate under the E.D. Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as "the Ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n upholding the inclusion of the house property Nos. 8 and 9, New High School Road, Visweswarapuram, Bangalore, in the estate of the deceased ? " So far as item No. (ii) referred to above, i.e., premises No. 9 is concerned, it has to be observed that its value was rightly included for purposes of levy of estate duty since the donee did not retain possession and enjoyment to the entire exclusion o....