Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

Goods detained for incomplete E-way bill. No intent to evade tax. No penalty under sec 129(3) for technical error. HC quashed orders.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No dispute on documents/goods. Part B filled before notice/seizure order. No mens rea found to evade tax. Citing M/S ROLI ENTERPRISES case, technical error without tax evasion intent warrants no penalty u/s 129(3). Similar ruling in PRECISION TOOLS INDIA case. Orders dated April 22, 2021 and November 20, 2021 quashed by HC. Writ petition allowed.....

PrevPreviousNextNext