2024 (7) TMI 1043

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... -<br>Service Tax<br>Hon&#39;ble Mr. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy For the Petitioner : Mr. Joseph Prabakar For the Respondents : Mr. T. Ramesh Kutty, Senior Standing Counsel. ORDER Both an order in original dated 20.06.2022 and the appellate order dated 23.02.2024 are challenged in this writ petition. 2. The petitioner was hospitalized in December 2021 for "triple vessel coronar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng 50% being borne by the recipient of services. He points out that 7.5% of the tax demand was remitted while presenting the statutory appeal and that the petitioner be provided another opportunity. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner agrees to remit an additional 7.5% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. 4. Mr. T. Ramesh Kutty, learn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on. These facts and circumstances warrant providing the petitioner an opportunity by putting the petitioner on terms. By taking into account the fact that the petitioner had earlier remitted 7.5% towards tax demand, reconsideration is necessary by directing the petitioner to remit an additional 7.5% of the disputed tax demand. 6. Therefore, the impugned order dated 20.06.2022 is set aside and t....