Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2024 (7) TMI 667

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Tanoy Chakraborty Mr. Saptak Sanyal For the CGST authority : Mr. K.K. Maiti Ms. Aishwarya Rajyashree ORDER Raja Basu Chowdhury , J : 1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 22nd June, 2023 passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the West Bengal GST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act'). 2. Records reveal that t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....donation of delay was also filed. A medical certificate in support of such application for condonation of delay was also placed on record. 5. The records reveal that Appellate Authority by its order dated 24th November, 2023 by recording that there is a delay of six days and the appeal having been filed beyond the time prescribed as provided for in Section 107(4) of the said Act was, inter alia, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to hear out the same. 10. Mr. Sanyal, learned Advocate enters appearance on behalf of the respondents. 11. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties and considered the materials on record. In this case it has been noticed that there is a statutory right of the Registered Tax Payer (RTP) to prefer an appeal from an order of adjudication passed under Section 73(9) of the said Act. 12. Adm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the delay beyond one month from the time prescribed had duly been considered in the case of S.K. Chakraborty & Sons v. Union of India & Ors., reported in (2023) SCC Online Cal 4759. It has been held that in absence of non obstante clause rendering Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, non applicable and in absence of specific exclusion of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, it would be im....