Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (10) TMI 1400

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....artment adopted the NIDB data to enhance the value and revised the Customs Duty to be paid. 2. Being aggrieved the Appellant had filed an Appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) has gone through the facts and stated his provisions and has held as under: 20. I also find that in the case of Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata Vs. M/s. Krishna Wax Pvt. Ltd. wherein Hon'ble CESTAT has passed the final order vide no. FO/75466-75472 dated 21.03.2018 where it is held as follows: "6. From the record, it also appears that the assessing officer has rejected the transaction value without any valid reasons and without new procedure as per Section 14 and valuation rules especially, there is nothing on record that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re also varying vastly. In fact, the price of 'Monaco' imported by the appellant under Bill of Entry No. 277105 was higher than the contemporaneous import of the same item at Euro 315. The Revenue has accepted that value and rejected all other values. Clearly, the effort is to assess imported goods at the higher end of the value spectrum. This is contrary to market reality as well as Valuation Rule. While market prices vary depending upon myriad factors, Rule 4 of Custom Valuation Rules specifically provides that transaction value should be the basis for the valuation of the consignment under assessment, unless the transaction value is not representing the full price for the reasons mentioned in the Rule itself. Law does not allow a pick an....