2024 (6) TMI 1037

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sentence dated 31.10.1998 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Jalandhar in Complaint Case No.1 25/2/1997 and No.1 24/2/1997, filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1 881 (hereinafter referred to as NI Act), respectively. 2. This common order of mine shall dispose of both of the above mentioned appeals since they arise out of same factual background with only difference being the cheque amount, the details of which are as follows : - Appeal before this Court Appeal before ASJ, Jalandhar Complaint before JMIC, Jalandhar Cheque details CRA-S-440-SBA- 2002 CRA-No.20 of 1999 No.125/2/1997 JLA-0513418 dated 22.12.1994 For Rs.92,250/- CRA-S-441-SBA- 2002 CRA-No.21 of 1999 No.124/2/1997 JLA-0513419 date....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nviction, the respondent preferred an appeal against the same before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, which was allowed and his conviction and sentence was set aside. Discontented by the judgment of acquittal passed by the lower Appellate Court, the complainant has approached this Court by way of the present appeals. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant inter alia contends that that the respondent categorically admitted his signatures on the cheques in question and issuance of the said cheques when he stepped into the witness box as his own witness as DW1. It was also admitted by him that he was present at the address where the demand notice was served on that very day. Learned counsel for the appellant vociferously contends that Sh.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the Branch Manager, ratifying the acts of Branch Manager retrospectively. It comes to the fore that on the date the complaints (supra) were filed by Sh. A.N. Pillai, Branch Manager, acting on behalf of the complainant federation, there was no such power of attorney duly authorizing the Branch Manager to file the said complaints. Furthermore, the complainant federation failed to produce any evidence to prove whether it is a Corporation or a Company registered under the Companies Act or a Cooperative Society. In the matter at hand, the Branch Manager who filed the complaints (supra) had no such power of attorney executed in his favour on the date the said complaints were filed. Albeit, a power of attorney was executed in his favour, the sa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ciation of the evidence is subject to the settled law that where two views are possible and out of the two, one points towards the innocence of the accused, the view which favours the accused should prevail over the other pointing towards his guilt. Furthermore, the trial Court has the additional advantage of closely observing the prosecution witnesses and their demeanour, while deciding about the reliability of the version of prosecution witnesses. (See H.D. Sundara and others Vs. State of Karnataka, Criminal Appeal No.247 of 2011 decided on 26.09.2023; Kali Ram v. State of H.P., 1973 (2) SCC 808 and Chandrappa and others v. State of Karnataka, (2007) 4 SCC 415). A Division bench of this Court in the judgment passed in State of Haryana Vs.....