2023 (9) TMI 1488

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Appellant : Shri Prashant Shukla, Advocate. For the Respondent : Shri Rakesh Agarwal, Authorized Representative. ORDER PER In compliance of the order dated 14 July 2023, appellant had produced all the invoices before the concerned Assistant Commissioner who also while complying the directions of the said order has verified the same. The verification report is placed on record, w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r appeal to be heard by this Tribunal. The findings in said Verification Report doesn't amount to be mandatory compliance of Section 35F CEA. 3. To counter the said submissions, the learned counsel has mentioned that from the verification report, it has come on record that the burden of amount duty involved has been borne by the appellant. There is no denial that the entire amount as demanded v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as has been confirmed against the appellant is Rs. 5,25,80,517/- (Five Crores Twenty Five Lakhs Eighty Thousand Five Hundred & Seventeen only). Admittedly, the said amount of duty stands paid to the extent @ Rs. 750 PMT. Apparently and admittedly the said amount is more than the amount of 7.5% of the amount as is required for pre-deposit in terms of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. As appar....