Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2024 (6) TMI 1013

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... NTCL (National Textile Corporation Limited), Calcutta on 23/10/2002 and on the same day NTCL has submitted their report. The Department has sent further samples on 01/04/2003 to NIFT, Delhi which sent its Report on 02/04/2003. Based on PMV estimate given by NTCL, Calcutta, the Show Cause Notice was issued to the Appellant seeking to deny the Drawback claims filed by them. After due process, the Adjudicating Authority rejected the Drawback Claims. Being aggrieved, the Appellants filed their Appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal vide its Order No. S-772/A/500/KOL/06 dated 25/05/2006 remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to grant Cross Examination of the persons conducting sample testing of the consignments. The Adjudicating Au....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the testing carried out by NIFT, Delhi, he points out that the samples were sent to them vide Department's letter dated 01/04/2003. Immediately on the next day i.e. 02/04/2003, NIFT has given their Test Report. Here also the procedure followed by NIFT to come to their conclusion is questionable. Only on account of these doubts, they have sought the Cross Examination of the persons conducting the test for coming to their conclusions. He points out that this cross-examination sought was not granted to them and this Bench vide their Order dated 25/5/2006 remanded the matter only to grant the Cross Examination of such persons. He submits that on the ground that the test was conducted by a panel of persons and not by an individual and such pers....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ittedly, no samples were drawn by the Department nor any samples were tested by NTCL or NIFT. In such a case, the Department could not have relied on the Test Report of NTCL/NIFT in respect of second lot of Shipping Bills to deny the Draw Back claim. In respect of first set of 17 Shipping Bills, on this count itself, we set aside the impugned Order and allow the Drawback claim of Rs. 38,63,529/- subject to the condition specified at Paragraph 10 below. 6. In respect of 16 Shipping Bills, as rightly pointed out by the Appellant, both the testing agencies have completed the test and also issued the Test Report in a record time of 24hrs/48hrs. This gives cause of some kind of doubt as to whether proper procedure was followed before coming to ....