Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 1013

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... drawn from the second lot of 16 Shipping Bills. The samples were sent to NTCL (National Textile Corporation Limited), Calcutta on 23/10/2002 and on the same day NTCL has submitted their report. The Department has sent further samples on 01/04/2003 to NIFT, Delhi which sent its Report on 02/04/2003. Based on PMV estimate given by NTCL, Calcutta, the Show Cause Notice was issued to the Appellant seeking to deny the Drawback claims filed by them. After due process, the Adjudicating Authority rejected the Drawback Claims. Being aggrieved, the Appellants filed their Appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal vide its Order No. S-772/A/500/KOL/06 dated 25/05/2006 remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to grant Cross Examination of the p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the same day when the samples were given by the Department. In respect of the testing carried out by NIFT, Delhi, he points out that the samples were sent to them vide Department's letter dated 01/04/2003. Immediately on the next day i.e. 02/04/2003, NIFT has given their Test Report. Here also the procedure followed by NIFT to come to their conclusion is questionable. Only on account of these doubts, they have sought the Cross Examination of the persons conducting the test for coming to their conclusions. He points out that this cross-examination sought was not granted to them and this Bench vide their Order dated 25/5/2006 remanded the matter only to grant the Cross Examination of such persons. He submits that on the ground that the test....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase of 17 Shipping Bills, the exports have taken place in June and July 2002. Admittedly, no samples were drawn by the Department nor any samples were tested by NTCL or NIFT. In such a case, the Department could not have relied on the Test Report of NTCL/NIFT in respect of second lot of Shipping Bills to deny the Draw Back claim. In respect of first set of 17 Shipping Bills, on this count itself, we set aside the impugned Order and allow the Drawback claim of Rs. 38,63,529/- subject to the condition specified at Paragraph 10 below. 6. In respect of 16 Shipping Bills, as rightly pointed out by the Appellant, both the testing agencies have completed the test and also issued the Test Report in a record time of 24hrs/48hrs. This gives cause ....