Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2024 (6) TMI 369

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ner : No appearance For the Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Notice dated 20.07.2022 bearing reference No.1895-6/2011/A3 issued by the respondent and quashing the same. 3. The cop....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 15,40,564/- 6 2009-10 Rs. 2,83,236/- 0 Rs. 2,83,236/-   Total Rs. 45,33,920/- Rs. 19,72,734/- Rs. 65,06,654/- 4. The impugned Notice is challenged in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ramendra Nath Gosh, (1972) 4 SCC 379 and the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Parle International Vs. Union o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ge of address being intimated to the Department and therefore, the petitioner had no knowledge about the said orders. It is further submitted that even without serving the assessment/re-assessment orders, the respondent has now issued impugned recovery notice dated 20.07.2022 initiating recovery action against the petitioner after 10 years of passing of such assessment/re-assessment orders. It is ....