2024 (6) TMI 369
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ner : No appearance For the Respondent : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Additional Government Pleader ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Notice dated 20.07.2022 bearing reference No.1895-6/2011/A3 issued by the respondent and quashing the same. 3. The cop....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Rs. 15,40,564/- 6 2009-10 Rs. 2,83,236/- 0 Rs. 2,83,236/- Total Rs. 45,33,920/- Rs. 19,72,734/- Rs. 65,06,654/- 4. The impugned Notice is challenged in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ramendra Nath Gosh, (1972) 4 SCC 379 and the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Parle International Vs. Union o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ge of address being intimated to the Department and therefore, the petitioner had no knowledge about the said orders. It is further submitted that even without serving the assessment/re-assessment orders, the respondent has now issued impugned recovery notice dated 20.07.2022 initiating recovery action against the petitioner after 10 years of passing of such assessment/re-assessment orders. It is ....
TaxTMI