2024 (4) TMI 811
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t : C.S.C., Gaurav Mahajan ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration dated April 27, 2023 and the order dated March 12, 2024 passed in ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gistration is cancelled." 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in the first line, the order states that a reply was filed by the petitioner on April 2, 2023 whereas the reasons for cancelling the registration is "response not received". He relies upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Writ Tax No.172 of 2023 titled as Surendra Bahadur Singh v. State of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ent of the Act nor can it be held to be in compliance of the mandate of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. He further argues that as the appeal has not been decided on merit, the doctrine of merger will have no application and it is only the order dated 07.01.2023 which affects the petitioner and as the same is devoid of any reasons, the same can be challenged before this Court as decided by....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Constitution of India, as such, the impugned order dated 07.01.2023 (Annexure - 2) is set aside. The petition is accordingly allowed. 9. It is, however, directed that the petitioner shall file reply to the show-cause notice within a period of three weeks from today. The Adjudicating Authority i.e. Assistant Commissioner, Gonda shall proceed to pass fresh order after giving an opportunity....
TaxTMI