Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (3) TMI 937

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r import of goods covered by bills of entry no. 8247479/17.10.2012 and no. 8765339/14.12.2012, with concurrent recovery of duty foregone of Rs. 4,60,15,779/-, under section 28 of Customs Act, 1962, along with interest under section 28AB of Customs Act, 1962, and confiscation of the impugned goods valued at Rs. 17,69,92,673/- under section 111(o) of Customs Act, 1962 subject to option for redemption on payment of fine of Rs.4,42,48,168/- in exercise of section 125 of Customs Act, 1962 and penalty of like amount under section 114A of Customs Act, 1962. 2. Admittedly, the imported goods were not installed after clearance but were stored in original condition pending acquisition of land for setting up of facility for manufacture of 'polymer ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ubmits that the impugned order has merely reiterated the obligations without considering the submissions made by the appellant. It is further submitted that the adjudicating authority had not ascertained the claim of export obligation having been fulfilled and, instead, appears to have relied entirely upon the non-issue of discharge certificate as trigger for demand of duty and other detriment. It is also contended that the time-limit for the installation of the capital goods having been extended by the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC), it was only fair and just for customs authorities to push back the period for fulfilment of export obligation and to ascertain compliance thereof. It is also submitted that the adjudicating authority had no....