2024 (3) TMI 338

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Harsh Makhija, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC for R-1 and 4. Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC and Mr. Prajesh Vikram Srivastava, Advocate. Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC for CBIC with Mr. Anand Pandey, Advocate. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 27.12.2023, whereby the impugned Show Cause N....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ers, return defaulters and tax nonpayers. To the said Show Cause Notice, a detailed reply dated 23.10.2023 was furnished by the petitioner giving full disclosures under each of the heads. 4. The impugned order, however, after recording the narration, records that the reply uploaded by the taxpayer is not satisfactory. It merely states that "And whereas, in response to the DRC-01, the Taxpayer s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her details were required, the same could have been specifically sought from the petitioner. However, the record does not reflect that any such opportunity was given to the petitioner to clarify its reply or furnish further documents/details. 7. In view of the above, the order cannot be sustained, and the matter is liable to be remitted to the Proper Officer for re-adjudication. Accordingly, th....