2024 (3) TMI 327

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase: For the Petitioner : Mr. Dinesh Kothari and Mr. B.S. Randhawa, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Additional Standing Counsel. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order in appeal dated 13.02.2024, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed solely on the ground of limitation. Petitioner had filed the appeal impugning order d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The said Show Cause Notice required the petitioner to appear before the undersigned i.e., authority issuing the notice. Notice does not give the name of the officer or place where the petitioner has to appear. Further, the digital signature in the show cause notice merely mention "digitally signed by DS GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK 07" 5. Further the said Show Cause Notice also does not put the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es that effective date of cancellation of registration is 01.07.2017 i.e., a retrospective date. 7. In fact, in our view, order dated 18.08.2022 does not qualify as an order of cancellation of registration. On one hand, it states that the registration is liable to be cancelled and on the other, in the column at the bottom there are no dues stated to be due against the petitioner and the table sho....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h satisfaction cannot be subjective but must be based on some objective criteria. Merely, because a taxpayer has not filed the returns for some period does not mean that the taxpayer's registration is required to be cancelled with retrospective date also covering the period when the returns were filed and the taxpayer was compliant. 11. It is important to note that, according to the respondent, o....