2020 (3) TMI 1466

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... RAMACHANDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE AND PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JUDGE For the Appellant : Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Shri Ghanshyam Patel, Government Advocate. ORDER 1. The Appellant has moved this Court being aggrieved of the order dated 28.11.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (S) No. 523 of 2009, whereby the answer paper of the writ petitio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed and '6' more marks have been awarded to the writ Petitioner; despite the fact that the contention raised by the Respondent- High Court was that because of nature of answer given, there was no chance to get a minimum of '6' more marks to the writ petitioner. The learned counsel submits that interference of this Court is necessary, in view of the specific direction given and the c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing precedents etc. are all matters to be decided after hearing both the sides, which is still to happen. 5. Insofar as the present order is concerned, it remains an 'interim order' and by virtue of proviso to Section 2(1) of the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006, no appeal is maintainable against any interim order. 6. The scope and ambit of writ appeal against....