Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2023 (9) TMI 1440

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Appellant : Sh. K.A. Jathin, AR For the Respondent: Sh. Pradyumna, Advocate ORDER PER D. M. MISRA Heard both sides and perused the records. 2. This appeal is filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 498/2009 dated 04.12.2009 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Mangalore. 3. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the respondent had filed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the adjudicating authority as well as the ld. Commissioner (Appeals). We find that the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) referring to the judgments of this Tribunal in the cases of CCE Rajkot vs. Rolex Rings P. Ltd - 2008 (230) ELT 569 (Tri. Ahmd.) and CCE Rajkot vs. Adani Pharmachem P. Ltd - 2008 (232) 804 (Tri. Ahmd.) held that 'port service' is an input service, accordingly, eligible for refund of the....