Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (2) TMI 652

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....khil Philip Manithottiyil, Smt. Daniya Rasheed Palliyalil, Sri. Naeem M. M. For the Respondents: By Adv. Sri. Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, Smt. Jasmine M. M. - GP JUDGMENT DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Shameem Ahamed for the petitioner, Ms. Jasmine M. M., learned Government Pleader for the 1st respondent and Mr. Thomas Mathew Nellimoottil, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sitional credit supra. The Bill No. 15538 was not found and it was noticed the incorrect amount was claimed against other bills. Some bills were not clearly visible. Prima facie, it was observed that the petitioner had violated Section 140 read with Rule 117 of the CGST Act and Rules made thereunder in respect of his claim for transitional credit. The petitioner was issued notice asking him to pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n 107 of the CGST/KSGST Act, 2017 against the impugned order in Exhibit P-7, the petitioner has approached this Court invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the said order as the appeal could be futile exercise inasmuch as the claim of the petitioner is in respect of the excise duty component allegedly paid by the petitioner. 4. This Court does not find ....