2024 (2) TMI 8
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ax 2006 challenging Section 19(15) of Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax 2006 as unconstitutional and unenforceable. 2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are as follows: (i)The petitioner is a registered dealer in mobile phones and he effected purchase of Nokia Mobile Phones from an authorised whole sale dealer namely M/s.Smart Trading Company, Madurai in September 2008. The petitioner had filed monthly returns in Form-I in the month of September for the assessment year 2008-2009 and claimed input tax credit for the purchase made during the relevant month. (ii) On 11.03.2009, the third respondent had issued a notice proposing to reverse the Input Tax Credit claimed by the petitioner to the tune of Rs. 1,04,673/- for the mont....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d contended that the registration of the whole sale dealer was cancelled on 21.04.2008 itself and the petitioner is said to have purchased from the said whole sale dealer in September 2008. He had further contended that the seller dealer is a non-existing dealer and thereby, assessing authority proposed to reverse the claim of Input Tax Credit to the extent of Rs. 1,04,673/- under Section 19(16) of TNVAT Act 2006 by an audit notice dated 11.03.2009. 5. The learned Additional Government Pleader had contended that the audit notice issued on 11.03.2009 would not amount to double taxation, in view of the fact that the wholesale dealer ( whose registration has been cancelled) has not paid any tax at all. He had further contended that when the p....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....order of cancellation of the registration certificate takes effect. Such dealer shall be liable to pay, in addition to the amount due, interest at the rate of one and a quarter percent, per month, on the amount of tax so payable, for the period commencing from the date of claim of input tax credit by the dealer to the date of its payment." 9. The writ petitioner herein being a registered dealer had effected purchase from the wholesale dealer namely M/s.Smart Trading Company, Madurai in September 2008. It is not in dispute by the writ petitioner that the registration of the wholesale dealer has been cancelled by the authorities on 21.04.2008 itself. 10. Section 40 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 is extracted as follows: 40.Co....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....respect of the same facts on which a penalty has been imposed under this subsection." 11. A combined reading of Section 19(15) and Section 40 of the Act will clearly indicate that in order to avail Input Tax Credit, a registered dealer has to furnish the original tax invoice of the sale evidencing amount of Input Tax and in case where registration certificate of the selling dealer is cancelled by the appropriate authorities, the purchasing dealer who had availed by way of Input Tax Credit shall pay the amount availed on the date from which the order of cancellation of registration certificate tax effected. Apart from that, the purchasing dealer shall by liable to pay interest also. Section 40 prohibits an unregistered dealer from collectio....