2009 (4) TMI 190

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Sumit Kumar, DR, for the Appellant. Shri Alok Kothari, C. A., for the Respondent. [Order per : C. Satapathy, Member (T)].- Heard both sides. 2. In this case, the original authority has decided the matter against the Respondents holding them liable to pay the Service Tax on the gross value of the services provided and has disallowed the deduction claimed by the Respondent as they did....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sed on stay orders passed by the Tribunal, which cannot be taken to have precedential value. Moreover, he relies on the order of Tribunal in the case of Naresh Kumar & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata reported in 2008 (11) S.T.R. 578 to support the claim that the tax on the gross value of the services has to be levied without allowing the deduction. 4. After hearing both si....