2024 (1) TMI 901
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ted 01.07.2011. The Bill of Entry was finally assessed and the goods were allowed to be cleared extending the benefit of the above notifications. The Appellant had produced, inter alia, certificate of origin provided by the supplier in Form A-1, which was accepted by the proper officer without demur. 1.1. On a purported review of the said Bill of Entry, it is claimed that investigation conducted revealed that based on certificate of origin issued for the said product, the goods were derived from Cocoa beans of Ghana origin and in such cases, based on the prevalent International price as well as information available on supplier website, it appeared that the regional value addition would only be in the region of 13-17% as against minimum qu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h interest is beyond the limitation period as stipulated under proviso to Section 28(1)(a) under Customs Act,1962. All the facts relevant for the purpose of assessment are known to the department and the proper officer allowed the exemption. The allegation that the appellant has deliberately mis-declared country of origin as Malaysia is ex-facie arbitrary, illegal and without any basis. Therefore, the extended period of limitation under proviso to Section 28 (4) is not invokable. 2.1. It is submitted that the country of origin criteria as specified under Rule 3 (b) of Customs Notification No. 189/2009 - Cus (NT) dated 31.12.2009 also cover products not wholly produced or obtained in the exporting party provided that the said products are e....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lions Ltd, 2017 (355) E.L.T. 585 (Tri. - Hyd.) R.S. Industries (Rolling Mills) Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur, 2018 (359) E.L.T. 698 (Tri. - Del.) Bullion and Jewellers Association Vs. Union of India, 2016 (335) E.L.T. 639 (Del.) Romil Jewelry 125 Niraj Industrial Estate, Opp: Sun Pharma Off: Mahakali Caves Road, Andheri (E), Mumbai 400093 Vs Commissioner Of Customs Air Cargo Complex Sahar, Andheri (E), Mumbai - 400099 - 2023-TIOL-839-CESTAT 3. On the other hand Shri A R Kanani, Learned Superintendent (AR) appearing on behalf of the revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 4. On careful consideration of the submission made by both the sides and perusal of record, we find that even though the appellant has made strong prima facie....