Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (1) TMI 755

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mrs.S.Premalatha, Junior Standing counsel ORDER This Writ Petition is filed challenging the assessment order passed by the respondent under section 143(3) r.w.s.144B of Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 07.12.2022. 2. Mr. N.V. Narayanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner filed her return of income for the AY 2021-22. The petitioner's case was selected for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing, the impugned order came to be passed and hence the same is liable to be set aside. 3. Per contra, the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent drew the attention of this Court to para No.7 of the counter affidavit filed by the respondent, wherein, it has been stated at the remarks column as follows ''...Before the reply got reflected in the ITBA, the proposal was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent and perused the materials available on record. 5. Though the petitioner filed her reply to the show cause notice dated 24.11.2022 within the time limit prescribed i.e., before 01.12.2022 at 13.19 hours, the respondent has not considered the same on account of the fact that the reply got reflected in ITBA-PAN only after the proposal w....