Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (1) TMI 727

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rintendent (AR) for the Respondent ORDER This appeal has been filed by Cello Household Appliances Private Limited. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant pointed out that the appellant had entered into leasing agreement with M/s. Rohit Polly Products Private Limited. The appellant had discharged Service Tax under the category of banking and financial services of availing exemption under Notificat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g classify it as banking and financial service. He argued that in respect of lease agreement M/s. Rohit Polly Products Private Limited the revenue as sought to classify under two different services. The impugned order uphold penalty both under 76 and 78. He argued that there was no fraud or suppression and even revenue was not sure where the said service should be classified. He argued that this i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nsferred to the lessee. He submits that entire reason for confirmation of demand is that the appellant had not paid VAT on the said service. He argued that merely because no VAT was paid on the component of rent on plant and machinery does not imply that possession and effective control was not transferred to the lessee. 3. Learned AR relies on the impugned order. 4. We have considered the rival....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ferred. We are not in agreement with this proposition. Department has to produce positive evidence to show that right of possession and effective control has not been transferred. Thus we do not find any merit in the impugned order seeking to clarify the activity of renting of plant and machinery as provision of supply of tangible goods service. 5. Moreover, the appellant has discharged the tax a....