Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (1) TMI 658

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....LE, JUDICIAL MEMBER:- This is an appeal filed against the order dated 21-01- 2022 passed by Principal Commissioner of Incomer Income, PCIT, Rajkot-1 for assessment year 2017-18. 2. The grounds of appeal are as under:-   Grounds of Appeal Tax effect relating to each Ground of appeal 1 The grounds of appeal mentioned hereunder are without prejudice to one another. N.A. As appeal is aga....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2.2019. The order u/s 263 of the Act is totally unjustified on facts as also in law therefore the same may kindly be quashed. N.A. As appeal is against the validity of revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT. 4 Your Honour's appellant craves leave to add, to amend, alter, or withdraw any or more grounds of appeal on or before the hearing of appeal. N.A. As appeal is against the validity of re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....see was 01-04-2016 hence the assessee is not eligible for deduction u/s. 80IB(11) of the Act. The Assessing Officer while completing the assessment has not examined the conditions stipulated in section 80IB(11A) as the assessee is having business of processing, observation and packaging of fruits and vegetables and whether he is eligible for the same deduction or not. The Pr. CIT issued show cause....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rest of Revenue and therefore section 263 order be set aside. 6. The ld. D.R. relied upon the order of Pr. CIT and submitted that since the assessee has wrongly availed the deduction under different section under which he is not eligible. The Assessing Officer has not taken cognizance of the same and passed the order without applying the proper section. 7. We have heard both the parties and peru....