Taxpayer's DDT Refund Claim u/s 264 to Be Reconsidered, Pr.CIT Ordered to Re-evaluate DTAA Benefits.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Revision u/s 264 - Claiming benefit of DTAA - refund of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) which was paid wrongly - This was not a case where a deduction was made u/s 195 towards tax on payments made to a non-resident and the parties had agreed that the deducting resident entity would bear the tax liability by compensating the non-resident by a proportional top up. Therefore, Section 248 is clearly inapplicable. The second ground on which the revision petition was rejected is also consequently unsustainable. - Pr.CIT directed to reconsider the matter u/s 264 - HC....