Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (1) TMI 516

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Revenue. After hearing both sides, I find that the issue lies on a very narrow compass. 3.1 Facts, as could be gathered from the documents placed on record, reveal that the appellant and M/s. Sri Gugan Mills [hereinafter referred to as 'SGM'] were the two units of M/s. Sharadha Terry Products Ltd.; the said M/s. SGM was an Export Oriented Unit (EOU). It appears that in-principle exit order was issued by MEPZ, Chennai on the condition that appropriate Customs and Excise Duty shall be paid on the stock of finished goods, inputs, raw materials and capital goods, which appears to have been paid by M/s. SGM and thereafter, final exit order was issued vide letter dated 09.05.2011. 3.2 It appears that the said M/s. SGM were entitled ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellate authority with a prayer for setting aside the above demand confirmed by the original authority; but however, even the first appellate authority vide Order-in-Appeal No. 127/2014-CE dated 25.04.2014 having upheld the Order-in-Original, the present appeal has been filed. 5.1 Shri S. Durairaj, Ld. Advocate for the appellant, seriously contended that the appellant had furnished all the details before the lower authorities with a request for verification, but however, the adjudicating authority, ignoring the said plea of the appellant, had passed the Order-in-Original dated 30.12.2013, which later on came to be upheld even by the first appellate authority. 5.2 He would also contend that the appellant has made available all the requ....