Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (1) TMI 365

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....anding Counsel. For the Respondent Through: Mr Nageshwar Rao, Adv. with Mr Parth and Ms Mehar Verma, Advs.   RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL): 1. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2007-08. 2. Via the instant appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 30.06.2017, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal']. 3. Mr Ruchir Bhatia, learned ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... hereafter referred to as the "Corporate Service Segment" [in short, "CSS"]. 4.3 The record also discloses that the matter was referred by the Assessing Officer (AO) to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). The TPO directed an upward adjustment amounting to Rs. 1,14,92,874/- in the Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) Segment. 4.4 Likewise, the TPO also ordered an upward adjustment a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....geshwar Rao, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of respondents/assessee, has however, drawn our attention to the finding of fact returned by the CIT(A), which, as noted above, was sustained by the Tribunal. According to Mr Rao, since each of the companies that were taken up for benchmarking were functionally dissimilar, the CIT(A) and Tribunal have reached the correct conclusion, which was to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Tribunal with regard to each of the comparables were the following: (i) Accentia: It was found that it had encountered an extraordinary circumstance in the form of amalgamation during the Financial Year (FY) 2006-07 (AY 2007- 08). (ii) Eclerx and Mold-Tek: The finding returned was that these entities were in the business of Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO)....