2020 (11) TMI 1113
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... For the Assessee by: None For the Revenue by: Shri V. Tripathi (DR) ORDER PER AMARJIT SINGH, JM: The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order dated 12.02.2019 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-30, Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as the "CIT(A)") relevant to the A.Y.2010- 11. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds: - "1. That on the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the time of hearing. 6. The petitioner prays for justice & relief. 3. We have heard the argument advanced by the Ld. Representative of the Department and has gone through the case carefully. In fact, the Ld. Representative of the assessee did not argue the case on merits but argued on this point that the CIT(A) has decided the matter of controversy in absence of the assessee and witho....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e laws. (1) CIT Vs. Premkumar Arjundas Luthra (HUF) (2017) 154 DTR (Bom) 302 (2) CIT Vs. S Chenniappa Mudaliar (1969) 74 ITR 1 (SC) 5. Accordingly in the interest of justice, we remit the issue raised in the appeal to the file of the Ld. CIT(A). Ld. CIT(A) is directed to consider the issue afresh and pass an order on the merits of the case after giving after giving an proper o....
TaxTMI