Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (3) TMI 185

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P. Karthikeyan, Member (T)]. - Vide the impugned order the Commissioner (A) held that imports of the appellants M/s. Nilos India Ltd. from M/s. Nilos GmBH Germany, an entity found to be related to it, had to be assessed by loading 10% discount allowed to it as "agent discount". In the appeal and during hearing, it is submitted that the impugned order held that....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2. On a careful consideration of the facts of the case, we find that the original authority had decided that "agent discount" allowed to the appellants had to be included in the value of the impugned goods in terms of Rule 9(1)(a) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. He had also found that Valuation Rules 5 and 6 were not applicable in determining the value of impugned goods. In the impugned orde....