2010 (1) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the revenue wherein three questions have been raised. "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in not upholding the order of the Assessing Officer in disallowing the deduction in respect of Rs.9,36,103/- on excess realisation of levy sugar price which was a contingent liability and was not due for payment? Whether on the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ignoring decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s. K.C.P. Limited vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 245 ITR421?" Heard Sri A.N. Mahajan, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Ashish Bansal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee. Sri A.N. Mahajan, learned Standing Counsel, has very fairly submitted that question no.1 is squarely covered by the decision of this ....