2009 (2) TMI 204

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... R.D. Murthy, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri V.P.C. Rao, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) (Oral)]. - In terms of the impugned order, the appellants are required to pre-deposit the following amounts : (a) Service Tax of Rs. 73,04,141/- plus Education Cess of Rs. 1,23,922/- for the period 1-7-2003 to 30-9-2006 (b) Interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uthority confirmed the proposals in the show cause notice. The learned Advocate invited our attention to the show cause notice, internal page 18 of the show cause notice, wherein it has been clearly stated that services rendered are entitled for the benefit of the exemption Notification till 1-3-2006. In spite of holding that in show cause notice, the Adjudication order holds that the category of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rvices rendered by Call Centre or Medical Transcription Centre in terms of Notification 8/2003-S.T., dated 20-6-2003. The said notification has been amended by Notification No. 12/2004-S.T., dated 10-9-2004, wherein the scope of call centre has been expanded. It was argued that the activities carried out by the appellant would indeed fall within the ambit of call centre as defined in the said noti....