2008 (11) TMI 227

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R, for the Respondent. [Order].- This appeal has been filed against the Order-in-Appeal No. 21/2008 dated 24-1-2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-I), Bangalore. 2. Shri C.R. Raghavendra, the learned Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellant and Smt. Sudha Koka, the learned SDR, for the Revenue. 3. I heard both sides. 4. The appellants purchased Capital Machi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ming insurance and also availing the Cenvat credit, it was argued that the appellants were getting double benefit. 4.2 The learned Advocate invited my attention to the following two decisions:- (i) Biopac India Corpn. Ltd. v. CCE, Vapi - 2008 (224) E.L.T. 548 (Tri.-Ahmd.) (ii) Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai - 2008 (223) E.L.T. 514 (Tri.-Mumbai) These two decisions are dir....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... credit even when the used Capital Goods were removed, as decided in the case of Madura Coats Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Tirunelveli - 2005 (190) E.L.T. 450 (Tri.-Bang.). Infact, only in the year 2007, a Notification No. 39/2007-C.E.(N.T.) dated 13-11-2007 had been issued providing for reversal of credit in case of removal of old and used Capital Goods by allowing specified depreciations. Therefore, there ....