Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (9) TMI 51

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the Respondent. [Order]. - Show Cause Notice dated 7.7.2003 demanding service tax of Rs.70,143/- together with interest and proposing imposition of penalty was issued to the assessees on the ground that they were rendering taxable service falling under the category of "clearing and forwarding agents" to M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. [White Cement Division]. The demand was confirmed vide adjudica....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Commissioner of Central Excise has reason to believe that by reason of omission or failure on the part of the assessee, to make a return under section 70 for any prescribed period or to disclose wholly or truly all material facts required for verification of the assessment under section 71, the value of taxable service has escaped assessment or has been under-assessed or service tax has not been ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... five year period of limitation is not available to the Department, is not tenable in the light of the fact that verification of the records resulted in the Department coming to know that the assessees did not disclose receipt of service charges for the second agreement for the White Cement Division. Therefore, I am in agreement with the learned DR that five year period has been correctly invoked ....