2009 (9) TMI 47

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m, Authorized Representative (DR), for the appellant. None (request for on merit), for the respondent. [Order per : Rakesh Kumar, Member (Technical)] - This is appeal by the Revenue against order-in-appeal No. 01/CE/CHD-II/2009 dated 13/4/2009 passed by CCE (Appeals), Chandigarh by which the Commissioner (Appeal) while upholding the service tax demand and penalty under Section 78 of the Fina....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sidered the submissions of the learned Departmental Representative and also gone through the cross objection of the respondent. 5. The period of dispute of this case is 2002 to 2005 and during this period, for non-payment of service tax with intent to evade the same, penalty were imposable under Section 78 and as well as 76 and there was no specific provision that when penalty under Section 78 ....