2008 (11) TMI 193
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....espondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) (Oral)].- In terms of the impugned order, the appellant is required to pre-deposit the following sums: (a) Towards service tax liability for the period from April, 2002 to March, 2007 Rs. 32,06,783/- and Education Cess Rs. 53,856/-. (b) Interest at the appropriate rate on the above amount under Section 75 of the Finance Act. Further, the follo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....voked. Even in the order there is no finding with regard to the suppression of facts. He pleaded that the appellants have prima facie a strong case on merits. He also stated that the provision invoked by the learned Adjudicating Authority was not correct at that time. In other words, a deleted provision had been invoked by the Adjudicating Authority for confirming the demand. In this connection, c....