Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (9) TMI 729

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of interest on the respondents. 2. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the respondent M/s. B.R Marbles Pvt. Ltd. Jabalpur, obtained an EPCG Authorization to import duty free capital goods for mining of marbles and exporting the same. The duty saved/foregone in terms of the said EPCG Authorization was Rs.18,09,396/- (Rupees Eighteen lakh nine thousand three hundred ninety six only) and the respondent was obligated to export, the marbles mined using the said imported capital goods to the tune of eight times the duty foregone. However, even before the mining activity could actually start, the mining activity was stayed by the orders of the Hon'ble Apex Court, issued on 21.09.2005, pursuant to a PIL filed by the local residents/body of Kat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ded of the aforesaid amount of duty saved in terms of the said EPCG License granted. 5. We have heard both sides. It is not in dispute that the respondents could not undertake any mining activity because of the aforesaid restrictions imposed by the Hon'ble Apex Court. To attach motives on part of the appellant under such circumstances is certainly not called for. It cannot be anybody's case that the respondents continued to import the capital goods with intentions of defrauding the revenue and depriving the department of its rightful claim. In any case the department has not been able to adduce any evidence in support of this proposition of theirs of mis-representation and deliberate suppression of facts. The fact that the respondents coul....