Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (11) TMI 167

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) (Oral)].- Revenue has filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. 18/2008-Cus., dated 14-3-2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax (Appeals), Visakhapatnam. 2. Shri V.P.C. Rao, the learned SDR appeared on behalf of the Department and Shri G.L Rawal, the learned Senior Advocate, appeared for the assessee. 3. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....st, CRCL, New Delhi. They were subjected to test at CRCL and the results were obtained after four months on 23-7-2004. The results indicated that the carotenoid value was below the specified limit. Consequently, proceedings were initiated for denial of the benefit of the Notification. The differential duty was demanded by the Original Authority in his order dated 28th December, 2006. The responden....