2008 (8) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sh, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order].- These applications are by the appellants pointing out that there is a mistake apparent from the record in Final Order Nos. 1273 & 1274/2007, dated 18-10-2007. It is submitted that Modvat credit on capital goods used at off-factory limestone mines during the periods August to October 1999 and October 2000 to April 2001 was denied in the above final order on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r with the cement factory and which catered only to the limestone requirement of the assessee. The learned consultant for the appellant submits that the capital goods in question were used only in captive mines and, therefore, in view of the apex Court's ruling rendered in the second Vikram Cements case, the appellants are entitled to avail Modvat credit on such capital goods. It is also pointed o....