2017 (2) TMI 1541
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r the Appellant None for the Respondent ORDER Per Ashok K. Arya: Revenue is in appeal against order in original No. 68/2013 dated 24.12.2013 passed by Commissioner of Custom (adjudication) Delhi, where under inter-alia the proceedings against the respondent, Ms. Nav Shakti Industries Pvt. Ltd have been dropped. 2. The Revenue has been represented by the Ld.AR Shri. K. Poddar and the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... from each of the consignments were sent to the Chief Chemist, Central Pulp and Paper Research Institute, Sharanpur, for testing. 3.2 Pending the test result of the samples, goods were provisionally assessed on execution of test bonds by the importer covering the difference between the duty to be finally assessed and the duty provisionally assessed and paid. 3.3 The test result of all the sa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ded that the importer did not produce any documents to show the fact of final assessment, therefore, impugned order wrongly concluded that goods were finally assessed. 5. After careful consideration of the facts of on record and the submissions of the Revenue, it appears that there have been factual mistakes in the impugned order. The impugned order wrongly notes that provisional assessments we....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI