Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕

Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws →

☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2023 (8) TMI 935

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....N. Goburdhun, Sr. Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Rajiv Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar, AOR Ms. Sunaina Kumar, Adv. ORDER 1. The assessment for the year 2002-2003 with respect to respondent-Society was finalized on 27.01.2004 and the Assessing Authority created an additional demand of Rs. 1,49,69,527/-(Rupees One Crore Forty Nine Lakhs Sixty Nine Thousand Five Hundred Twe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g the decision taken and following the decision in the case of Sadhu Overseas Vs. State of Haryana reported in (2007) 30 PHT 582 as well as Ratti Woolen Mills Vs. State of Punjab reported in (2007) 29 PHT 556, the High Court allowed the writ petition(s) and directed the refund to be made. 4. Further, the High Court directed that the interest shall be calculated at a statutory rate of 12 per cent ....

PrevPreviousNextNext