Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2023 (8) TMI 901

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the appellant inter alia had paid certain amounts to M/s. Areva T&D Holding SA, France towards Royalty and Technical Knowhow and had made provision for the same in their books of account. 2.2 The Department, entertaining a doubt, in terms of Explanation to Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Explanation to Rule 6(1) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, that where the transaction of taxable service was with an 'Associated Enterprise', any payment received towards the value of taxable service would include any amount credited or debited, as the case may be, whether called "suspense account" or by any other name in the books of account and that there was Service Tax liability, issued a Show Cause Notice dated 27.01.2011 proposing inter a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 9.1 We have considered the rival contentions and we have also gone through the order of this Bench relied upon by the Ld. Advocate. 9.2 We find, in the facts of this case as well as the grounds urged by the appellant, that the appellant has not disputed but has paid the tax as demanded; but however, the only grievance of the appellant is as to the chargeability of interest. 10. We find that after hearing both sides and following the ratio in the cases of M/s. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Commissioner of S.T., Mumbai [2016 (41) S.T.R. 121 (Tri. - Mumbai)], M/s. Alstom T and D India Ltd. and Schneider Electric Infrastructure Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, LTU, Chennai & ors. [2018-VIL-88-CESTAT-CHE-ST] and M/s. ....