Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 669

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e assessment year 2018-19, under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"), assessee filed this appeal. 2. Briefly stated relevant facts are that the assessee is engaged in the business of legal process outsourcing. It filed its return of income for the assessment year 2018-19 on 28/11/2018 declaring total income of Rs. 14,88,59,090/-. The assessee was found to have entered into international transactions for a sum of Rs. 106.16 crores with its Associated Enterprises (AE) for provision of ITE services and, therefore, determination of Arms' Length Price (ALP) was referred to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO). After obtaining the order of the TPO under section 92CA(3) of the Act, draft as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... factual mistakes. Learned AR further submitted that learned DRP, in the same breath, recorded that the assessee is a BPO and also engaged in high end ITE services vide paragraph Nos. 2.7.8 and 2.7.5 respectively, which shows that facts of some other case crept into the order of the assessee. According to the learned AR, for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, after the assessments were set aside by the ITAT, the learned Assessing Officer accepted the assessee as BPO, rendering repetitive services and, therefore, the findings of the learned DRP cannot be sustained. 6. Per contra, learned DR submitted that the learned DRP properly considered the remand report and also the objections filed by the assessee and since the assessee at th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d), 10. Allsec Technologies Ltd., 11. Microland Limited, 12. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd., 13. CES Limited, 14. Manipal Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd., 15. Vitae International Accounting Services Private Limited and 16. Ultramarine & Pigments Ltd; whereas learned TPO referred to - 1. Denave India Pvt. Ltd., 2. Impressions Services Pvt. Ltd., 3. ERM India Pvt. Ltd., 4. Husys Consulting Ltd., 5. Ace Integrated Solutions Ltd., 6. Everstone Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd., 7. Teks Tech Inspection India Pvt. Ltd., 8. Remunance Systems Pvt. Ltd., 9. Apave Assessments India Pvt. Ltd., 10. Mercer Con....