Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 624

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... against duty demand and penalty imposed upon Appellant whereas the Customs Appeal No. C/11630/2013 is against the confiscation of goods and imposition of fine. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a 100% EOU engaged in manufacture of Polyester grey fabrics falling under Chapter 54 of Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act,1985. A detailed show cause notice dated. 13.02.2008 was issued to the Appellant, Arvind D. Patil, Proprietor and M/s Neeraj Exim Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata alleging that Appellant had in the guise of making deemed exports to another EOU M/s Neeraj had diverted the goods and created fictitious clearance documents to M/s Neearj whereas the goods were not physically transported to the EOU at West Bengal but ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation No. 1/95-CE dated 04.01.1995, Chapter 10 of supplementary instruction issued by the CBEC and Rule 20 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were not followed by the appellant. The Appellant complied with all the conditions of the Rules and Regulations and therefore demand is not sustainable. As per terms of the contract, the appellant have cleared goods to M/s Neeraj Exim against Form CT-3 at ex-factory and received payment towards it. Since it is not in dispute about genuineness of CT-3 form, warehousing certificate and payment, the duty demand is not sustainable against the appellant. He placed reliance on the following judgments. (i) Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd. - 2012 (277) ELT 398 (T) (ii) Sunshine O....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ter Ltd. Vs. CCE - 2008(222) ELT 376 (T) 7. Shri Kalpesh P. Shah Learned Superintendent (AR) appearing for the Revenue supports the findings of the Ld. Commissioner in the impugned order. 8. Heard both the sides and perused the records. We find that the case of the department against the appellant is that Grey Fabrics sold to M/s Neeraj Exim Pvt. Ltd. were diverted into Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) in guise of clearance to the said EOU unit of West Bengal and failed to get the goods re-warehoused at the said EOU. The Ld. Commissioner by relying the report of Commercial Tax Department, West Bengal confirmed the demand. The Ld. Commissioner in the present matter also observed that the owner/ operators of 3 vehicle categorically denied transp....