Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (7) TMI 138

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... development and real estate. Respondent filed its return of income on 30/09/2010 declaring loss of Rs. 86,50,349/-. Assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') came to be passed on 28/03/2013 and the income came to be assessed at Rs. 3,86,29,793/- after making disallowances of Rs. 4,05,42,608/- under Section 14A of the Act and of Rs. 67,37,534/- under Section 36(i)(iii) of the Act. The assessed income thereafter was set off against carried forward business loss making the total income of respondent as nil. 3. Aggrieved by the said assessment order, respondent preferred an appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-36, Mumbai [CIT(A)]. CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of respondent and relied upon a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s and in the circumstances of the case and in law disallowance of expenditure was required to be made u/s. 14A in relation to the share income from the firm received by the assessee as such share income is exempted under 10(2A) of the Act and whether such disallowance was required to be determined in accordance with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules 1962?" (c) "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble ITAT was justified in not upholding the computation of the disallowance u/s. 14A made by the assessing officer when the assessing officer has simply accepted the computation made by the assessee?" (d) Without prejudice to the above, whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law....