Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2023 (6) TMI 1007

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ha Merla , Member ( Technical ) ] 1. Dissatisfied with the Impugned Order dated 14/10/2021, passed in IA No. 114/2020 in C.P.(IB) No. 679/7/HDB/2018, whereby and whereunder the 'Adjudicating Authority' has rejected the said Application, filed by the 'Resolution Professional' (RP) under Section 31(1) of the 'Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016' (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), it is observed as follows: 10. In the instant case before us, M/s Invent Assets Securitisation & Reconstruction Private Limited cannot submit resolution plan as co-Applicant along with M/s Longview Resources (HK) Limited Hong Kong, without the prior approval of RBI under Section 10 (2) of SARFAESI Act. Therefore, we are of the view that prima facie....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ub section (1) of Section 53 including the priority and the value of security interest of secured creditors and such other requirements as may be specified by the Board". 2. Having observed that the 'Resolution Plan' preferred by one of the Resolution Applicants, required prior approval of RBI, the 'Adjudicating Authority', while rejecting the 'Resolution Plan' passed an order for Liquidation. The Appellant herein is the 'Interim Resolution Professional' ("IRP") whose main grievance is that while ordering Liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, the 'Adjudicating Authority' had appointed the 2nd Respondent herein as the 'Liquidator' contrary to the Statutory Provisions, by disqualifying the Appellant under Section 34 (4)(a) of the Code. 3....