Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (8) TMI 184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Reddi, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) (Oral)]. - In terms of the impugned order, the appellant is required to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 86,79,806/- towards Service Tax and Rs. 1,000/- towards penalty. 2. We heard both sides. 3. As the, issue lies within a narrow compass, we decided to take up both the stay application and appeal together. 4. In the impugned orde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t of the input service credit. Further, the learned Advocate relied on the decision of the two orders of the Commissioners of Calicut and Cochin Commissionerates viz. 1/2006 dated 6-9-2006 (Calicut) and 12/2006/S.T. dated 27-1-2006 (Cochin) in respect of BSNL, the same appellant. In view of this, we feel that it is a fit case for remanding it to the Original Authority for de novo decision after ta....