2008 (8) TMI 184
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Reddi, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) (Oral)]. - In terms of the impugned order, the appellant is required to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 86,79,806/- towards Service Tax and Rs. 1,000/- towards penalty. 2. We heard both sides. 3. As the, issue lies within a narrow compass, we decided to take up both the stay application and appeal together. 4. In the impugned orde....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t of the input service credit. Further, the learned Advocate relied on the decision of the two orders of the Commissioners of Calicut and Cochin Commissionerates viz. 1/2006 dated 6-9-2006 (Calicut) and 12/2006/S.T. dated 27-1-2006 (Cochin) in respect of BSNL, the same appellant. In view of this, we feel that it is a fit case for remanding it to the Original Authority for de novo decision after ta....