2023 (4) TMI 608

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., PRESIDENT HON'BLE Ms. HEMAMBIKA R. PRIYA , MEMBER ( TECHNICAL ) For the Appellant : Shri Z U Alvi , Advocate For the Respondent : Dr. Radhey Tallo , Authorised Representative ORDER JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA The order dated 10.02.2017 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) to the extent it holds that the appellant would be liable to pay service tax with interest has been assailed in th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t the confirmation of demand of service tax with interest was upheld. This appeal has accordingly, been filled to assail that portion of order of Commissioner (Appeals) that confirms the demand of service tax with interest. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the issue as to whether the aforesaid value of non-monetary consideration could be included in the taxable value has been....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....I 83 Cestat kol wherein it was held: "7. We find that the issue to be decided is whether costs reimbursed by the appellant to CISF for medical & telephone facilities, imprest expenses and notional value for rent free accommodation, free supply of rented vehicles, etc. are to be added to the assessable value for payment of service tax on reverse charge basis. The appellant is already depos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....it, 2019 (24) GSTL 232 (Tri- Delhi), has also held that free accommodation provided by the service recipient to CISF security personnel providing security services is not includable in taxable value. We find that the Ld. Commissioner has merely confirmed the demand, in para 26 appearing in Page 25 of the impugned adjudication order, on the ground that the issue was pending for consideration before....