Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (4) TMI 608

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....BIKA R. PRIYA , MEMBER ( TECHNICAL ) For the Appellant : Shri Z U Alvi , Advocate For the Respondent : Dr. Radhey Tallo , Authorised Representative ORDER JUSTICE DILIP GUPTA The order dated 10.02.2017 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) to the extent it holds that the appellant would be liable to pay service tax with interest has been assailed in this appeal. 2. The allegations against ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ax with interest was upheld. This appeal has accordingly, been filled to assail that portion of order of Commissioner (Appeals) that confirms the demand of service tax with interest. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the issue as to whether the aforesaid value of non-monetary consideration could be included in the taxable value has been decided in M/s. Central Industrial Securit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... find that the issue to be decided is whether costs reimbursed by the appellant to CISF for medical & telephone facilities, imprest expenses and notional value for rent free accommodation, free supply of rented vehicles, etc. are to be added to the assessable value for payment of service tax on reverse charge basis. The appellant is already depositing service tax on reverse charge basis on the cos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ee accommodation provided by the service recipient to CISF security personnel providing security services is not includable in taxable value. We find that the Ld. Commissioner has merely confirmed the demand, in para 26 appearing in Page 25 of the impugned adjudication order, on the ground that the issue was pending for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case Bhayana Builders (P) Ltd (S....