Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (4) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the offence(s) under Sections 132 (1) (b), (f), (h), (j) & (l) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 03.08.2022. Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that offence against the petitioner is triable by Magistrate, compoundable and having maximum punishment of 5 years. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that before arrest, no summon or demand notice was given to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that Mohammad Shadab Kadri is kingpin in this case. Petitioner has nothing to do with the alle....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....No.18825/2021 decided on 05.02.2022; (12) Naresh Chandra Jajra Vs. Union of India in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1914/2022 decided on 25.02.2022; (13) Sanjeev Jain Vs. Union of India in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3608/2021 decided on 31.05.2021; (14) Gaurav Kumar Aanchaliya Vs. Union of India in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.3624/2019 decided on 13.05.2019; (15) Chandu @ Chandra Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2381/2021 decided on 16.02.2021; (16) Pradeep Kumar Bansal Vs. Union of India in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12093/2020 decided on 04.11.2020; (17) Saurabh Kumar Jain Vs. Union of India in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2695/2021 decided on 16....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....00 Crores for granting bail. So, if this court directs the petitioner to deposit loss of input tax credit of nearing Rs.88.33 Crores, then, respondent shall not have any objection for granting bail to the petitioner otherwise the bail filed by the petitioner be dismissed. 5. Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent has placed reliance upon the following judgments: (1) Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors. in Miscellaneous Application No.1849/2021 in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5191/2021; (2) Nimmagadda Prasad Vs. CBI reported in (2013) 7 SCC 466; (3) Yashik Jindal Vs. Union of India in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.14792/2022 decided on 16.12.2022; (4) Lalit Goyal Vs. Union Of India in Sp....