2007 (11) TMI 280

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppeal is filed by the revenue against the order-in-appeal No. AKD(138)115/2005, dated 20-10-2005, Respondents are absent despite notice and seek adjournment. Since the issue involved is covered by the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, I take up the appeal in the absence of the respondents. 2. Considered the submissions made by ld. SDR and perused the records. The issue involved in thi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad in First Appeal No. 42 of 2007 decided on 3-4-07 [2008] (223) E.L.T. 161 (Bom.). Their Lordships in that appeal held as under: "5 Learned Assistant Solicitor General Shri. Sharma vehemently argued that if there is time-gap between the date on which the differential rates applicable with retrospective effect where learnt and the date on which the duty was paid, assess....